Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nint

[El Guapo]

"Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lick@thisisnotrealitsforspam.hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:4434134d$0$33900$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
> chrisv wrote:
>> Phil Da Lick! wrote:
>>
>>
>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>>
>>
>> *plonk*
>>
>
> Fuck off twat. I don't really care that you've *plonk*'d me for the tenth
> time.
>
> Somebody [if there is anybody left this idiot hasn't plonked] reply to
> this so the idiot can see it.
>

 

[Phil Da Lick!]

Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI,IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent*more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x

El Guapo wrote:
> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lick@thisisnotrealitsforspam.hotmail.com>
> wrote in message
> news:4434134d$0$33900$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Phil Da Lick! wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *plonk*
>>>
>>
>> Fuck off twat. I don't really care that you've *plonk*'d me for the
>> tenth time.
>>
>> Somebody [if there is anybody left this idiot hasn't plonked] reply to
>> this so the idiot can see it.

*bows*