lmao, no no no. AND no again.
First off, the Vita is still relatively new so the percentage isn't as high YET, but it's still well above 1%. There are a good chunk of us on this site alone that are part of that percent.
Secondly, I'm not retarded. I understand you can only play one friggan game at a time, genius. I never once implied that I was upset because I couldn't play 90 games ALL AT ONCE. I am concerned with the hassle of deleting/redownloading/installing and the save files that go with it. Sure, when a new game comes out I could very easily delete an older one to make room for it. However, not all of us were blessed with internet from the Gods and to redownload the deleted game later one when I decide I want to play it again becomes a hassle on my slow internet. I could store the "bubbles" on my PS3 too, but my PS3's hard drive is currently full as well and what about those who do not own a PS3?
I'm glad YOU are content with deleting old games and redownloading them later but you don't speak for everybody. You paid 300ish bucks for your Vita so you are entitled to play and enjoy/hate it in the manner you so choose, just as myself and others are entitled to play/enjoy/hate ours how we like. For many of us, limiting the amount of apps/games you can have on your shiny $300 device is a kick in the nads. 90 open slots doesn't mean 90 retail games, either. There are PS1 classics, PSP titles, Minis, PS Mobile games and apps, digital only PSN titles, non-gaming related apps, demos, and many more. I personally only own a handful of full retail games yet my limit for 100 apps/games was reached a while ago.
It's just laziness in design on Sony's part and could lead to them losing potential profits when more people start capping out. It's 2013 and something as simple as not limiting the amount of purchases (outside of how much memory your card can hold, obviously) is not too much to ask. Hell, Sony JUST now added folders, something which should have been part of the initial OS.
